Jacobs v. Satterwhite

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that take-nothing summary judgment on all claims was erroneous as to claim not addressed in motion for summary judgment
• holding that court of appeals errs in reversing summary judgment on claim when appellant does not complain of judgment’s rendition on that claim
• holding that a party waived any error as to a claim by not complaining on appeal about the summary judgment on the claim
• recognizing appellate court may not reverse summary judgment on a particular claim when appellant fails to challenge summary judgment on that claim
• holding that although defendant moved for summary judgment on only one of two claims asserted by plaintiff, because the trial court rendered judgment that the plaintiff take nothing, the judgment was erroneous but was final
• holding that although defendant moved for summary judgment on only one of two claims asserted by plaintiff, because the trial court rendered judgment that the plaintiff take nothing, the judgment was erroneous but was final

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).