Jacobs v. New Jersey State Highway Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• instructing that cognate laws are to be viewed with a presumption that they were \intended to become part of a consistent whole unless they or parts of them are expressly or impliedly incompatible\
• viewing cognate laws with presumption that they were intended to become \part of a consistent whole unless they or parts of them are expressly or impliedly incompatible\
• considering untimely challenge to Authority’s retirement policy for workers because of “the importance of the public question involved”
• viewing cognate laws with presumption that they were intended to become “part of a consistent whole unless they or parts of them are expressly or impliedly incompatible”
• N.J.S.A. 27:12B-5(q) did not confer powers on the Authority to control retirement age of employees
• Highway authority deemed a state agency but only for the limited purpose of compliance with the Public Employee's Retirement System mandates.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).