Jacobs v. Meyers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that documents retrieved from official government websites, including state and county websites, were “clearly proper” subjects of judicial notice
• noting that “[c]ourts routinely take judicial notice of … governmental records [retrieved from official government websites]”
• observing that courts may take judicial notice of “documents retrieved from official government websites” and collecting cases
• noting that pursuant to Rule 201, courts may consider, inter alia, “documents filed with governmental entities and available on their official websites”
• finding that it was “clearly proper to take judicial notice” of “documents retrieved from official government websites”
• explaining that it is “clearly proper to take judicial notice” of “documents retrieved from official government websites”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).