Skip to main content
· 11/16/2016

Jacobs v. Collison

Citations

  • 2016 Ark. App. 547
  • 505 S.W.3d 254
  • 2016 Ark. App. LEXIS 585

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff’s failure to plead specific facts was fatal to his claim under subchapter 82.003(6)
  • stating that plaintiff's “failure to state a plausible claim would outweigh the other Hensgens factors”
  • explaining that “‘naked assertion[s]’ devoid of ‘further factual enhancement’” are not sufficient to prevent dismissal
  • explaining that “‘naked assertion[s]’ devoid of ‘further factual enhancement’” are not sufficient to prevent dismissal
  • explaining that “‘naked assertion[s]’ devoid of ‘further factual enhancement’” are not sufficient to prevent dismissal
  • explaining that “‘naked assertion[s]’ devoid of ‘further factual enhancement’” are not sufficient to prevent dismissal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bart F. Virden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.