Jacobs, Daniel S. v. Schiffer, Lois J.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a government employee has “an interest in communicating with his attorney” under the First Amendment and reviewing the contours of that right
• explaining that only ”aspect[s] of the case on which the private party prevailed” are relevant to the court’s substantial justification inquiry
• discussing the definition of the government’s “position” in a substantial justification inquiry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).