Jacob Adams v. Cyrus Vance, Secretary of State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that application of injunctive-relief standards changes where core concerns of the executive branch are at stake
• stating that even “directing action by the Secretary of State in foreign affairs” constitutes an irreversible “intrusion” on “the core concerns of the executive branch”
• “The grant of a temporary restraining order under Rule 65(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., is generally not appealable.”
• court need not rule on a jurisdictional question when the issue is difficult and inadequately presented in the record or briefing and the merits are clearly against the party seeking to invoke jurisdiction
• \request for an order directing action by the Secretary of State in foreign affairs\
• court need not rule on a jurisdictional question when the issue is difficult and inadequately presented in the record or briefing and the merits are clearly against the party seeking to invoke jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).