JACLYN SWEDBERG v. GOLDFINGER'S SOUTH, INC., D/B/A SHOWGIRLS, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a state is not precluded from relying on rule in Strassheim—even absent a statute—given the “Strassheim Court itself made no reference to the need for such a statutory provision”
• holding that a state is not precluded from relying on rule in Strassheim — even absent a statute — given the “Strassheim Court itself made no reference to the need for such a statutory provision”
• holding, in the absence of a state jurisdictional statute, a state is not precluded from relying on rule in Strassheim, given \Strassheim Court itself made no reference to the need for such a statutory provision\
• recognizing “effects” doctrine established in Strassheim and stating “a State is not deprived of jurisdiction over every criminal case in which the defendant was not physically present within the State’s borders when the crime was committed”
• recognizing \effects\ doctrine established in Strassheim and stating \a State is not deprived of jurisdiction over every criminal case in which the defendant was not physically present within the State's borders when the crime was committed\
• “The general rule, accepted as ‘axiomatic’ by the courts in this country, is that a State may not prosecute an individual for a crime committed outside its boundaries.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).