Jacksonville, Mayport, Pablo Railway & Navigation Co. v. Schumacher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Nothing in the constitution or statutes suggests that continued presence of the indictment [or information] in the file or courtroom is necessary in order to maintain already vested jurisdiction .”
• “We agreed with the State [in Davis], clarifying that jurisdiction should generally be viewed as vested in courts, not judges. Unlike subject matter jurisdiction in a court, the authority of a judge is not jurisdictional.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).