Jackson's Admr. v. Asher Coal Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘When a statute is fairly open to two constructions, either one of which will carry out its purpose, and this court, upon full consideration, adopts one of these constructions, it should be adhered to, especially when, as in this instance, it has become a settled part of the law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Matheney v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2006-04-04· cited 67×
• Fentzka's Administrator v. Warwick Construction Co.
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1915-02-09· cited 16×
• Hunt v. Crocker
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1932-12-06· cited 13×
• Shutt's Admr. v. Shutt's Admr.
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1921-06-21· cited 12×
• Bannon v. Fox
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1923-05-18· cited 7×
• Salyer v. Consolidation Coal Co.
  Sixth Circuit· 1918-01-08· cited 5×
• Commonwealth v. Bingham's Admr.
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1920-03-26· cited 3×
• Blake Coal Mining Co. v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1922-10-20· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Louisville & N. R. R. v. Herndon's Admr.
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1907-10-10· cited 14×
• McFarland's Admr. v. L. & N. R. R.
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1908-10-30· cited 13×
• Buckner's Adm'rs v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1905-05-31· cited 9×
• Underwood v. Underwood's Admr.
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1901-11-19· cited 8×
• Phillips v. Hundley
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1909-11-04· cited 5×