Jackson v. United States Department of Justice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that after the selectee “schedule[s] a consular interview,” he shall be issued a diversity visa “if he meets the criteria to obtain one”
• noting that the legal availability of a certain kind of relief “goes to the merits”
• “[C]ourts may assume without deciding that plaintiffs’ statutory claims are reviewable and proceed to the merits notwithstanding consular nonreviewability.” (internal quotation omitted)
• “[C]ourts may assume without deciding that plaintiffs’ statutory claims are reviewable and proceed to the merits notwithstanding consular nonreviewability.” (internal quotation omitted)
• “[C]ourts may assume without deciding that plaintiffs’ statutory claims are reviewable and proceed to the merits notwithstanding consular nonreviewability.” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)
• “[I]f [s]he meets the criteria to obtain one, the State Department shall issue [her] a diversity visa.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).