Jackson v. Thompson
Citations
- 38 Wash. 282
- 80 P. 454
- 1905 Wash. LEXIS 1162
Syllabus
<p>Indians—Treaties—Pubuo Lands—Grants—Restriction on Alienation—Deeds—Repugnancy. A restriction on alienation in a patent of lands allotted to an Indian, pursuant to a treaty, is not void because repugnant to the habendum clause and grant of an absolute fee, since that rule does not apply where the Indians are wardá of the government; and such patent passes only the right of possession and occupancy.</p> <p>Same—Wills—Devise Violating Restriction on Alienation. The restriction on the alienation in a patent to an Indian allottee on the Tulalip reservation, prevents the disposition of the lands by will.</p>
Judges: Boot, Budkin, Crow, Dunbah, Fullerton, Hadley, Mount, Took
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Goodrum v. BuffaloEighth Circuit· 1908-07-23· cited 52×
- Hayes v. BarringerEighth Circuit· 1909-03-13· cited 24×
- Guyatt v. KautzWashington Supreme Court· 1905-12-21· cited 7×
- Egan v. McDonaldSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1915-08-07· cited 6×
- Nelson v. JohnWashington Supreme Court· 1906-08-25· cited 3×
- Prichard v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Iowa· 1969-01-14· cited 1×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.