Jackson v. Superior Court of Cal.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an unfulfilled threat of discipline, taken alone, is not a materially adverse action
• ruling that knowledge of supervisors' location monitoring would not deter a reasonable employee from pursuing protected activity
• concluding that employer directing other coworkers to monitor employee wasn’t materially adverse
• noting that isolated administrative errors that were later resolved did not cause lasting harm or injury sufficient to dissuade a reasonable employee from engaging in protected activity
• explaining that on summary judgment the court cannot credit “inferences that are supported by only speculation or conjecture”
• noting that, following Ortiz, identification of a similarly situated employee remains an element under the McDonnell Douglas framework

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).