Jackson v. Sturkie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting injunction where the defendant 4 “amply possesses the means for future infringement, either during a live concert or through the 5 production of infringing video cassettes”
• “[D]efendant’s lack of participation in this litigation has given the court no assurance that defendant’s infringing activity will cease. Therefore,.-plaintiff, is entitled to permanent injunctive relief,” (alteration added)
• “[Djefendant’s lack of participation in this litigation has given the court no assurance that defendant’s infringing activity will cease. Therefore, plaintiff is entitled to permanent injunctive relief.”
• “[D]efendant’s lack of participation in this litigation has given the court no assurance that defendant’s infringing activity will cease.”
• “[D]efendant’s lack of participation in this litigation has given the court no assurance that defendant’s infringing activity will cease. Therefore, plaintiff is entitled to permanent injunctive relief.”
• “[D]efendant’s lack of participation in this litigation has given the court no assurance that defendant’s infringing activity will cease. Therefore, plaintiff is entitled to permanent injunctive relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).