Jackson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding “that [where] Jackson did not challenge his convictions, but instead attacked only his sentences under case law existing at the time he committed his offenses[,]” the lower court “should have considered the merits of his arguments under rule 3.800(a)”
• reversing dismissal of motion to correct sentence where postconviction court did not address claim that Hegstrom applied, thus making Jackson's sentence for armed robbery illegal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hood v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-31· cited 3×
• Hopping v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-06-04· cited 3×
• JAMES RAY PARISH v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-06-08· cited 2×
• Tommy L. Randolph v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-03-05

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hegstrom
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1981-07-30· cited 126×
• Borges v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1982-04-08· cited 116×
• State v. Enmund
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-08-29· cited 104×
• Cone v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1973-03-07· cited 80×
• Brown v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-04-14· cited 47×
• Fundak v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-06-30· cited 14×
• Harris v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-11-14· cited 9×
• O'Neal v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-12-17· cited 3×