Jackson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]hreats made by a client against the life of a person during a professional consultation with his attorney are not privileged.” (quoting 28 Ruling Case Law 559, 560)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Boyd v. Comdata Network, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2002-04-30· cited 182×
• State of Tennessee v. Noura Jackson
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2014-08-22· cited 124×
• State v. Green
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1986-09-08· cited 61×
• Crittendon v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1928-07-16· cited 12×
• State v. Bobo
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1981-07-09· cited 12×
• United States v. Plaut
  United States Court of Military Appeals· 1969-04-25· cited 8×
• Armstrong v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1930-05-26· cited 2×
• Burke v. The TN. Walking Horse Breeders
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1997-05-28
• DANA MARLENE PAGLIARA v. TIMOTHY J. PAGLIARA
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2020-06-29
• In Re Investigation Of Law Solutions Chicago, LLC
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2021-01-22
• Moore v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2022-11-17
• Moore v. United States En Banc
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2025-09-04

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dickason v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1918-04-15· cited 22×
• McMannus v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1858-12-15· cited 10×
• Poteete v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1878-04-15· cited 8×