Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 11/20/1974
Jackson v. State
Citations
- 516 S.W.2d 167
- 1974 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1946
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a defendant’s confession or admission is sufficient to corroborate accomplice testimony in most circumstances
- holding that a defendant = s confession or admission is sufficient to corroborate accomplice testimony in most circumstances
- holding that a defendant’s confession or admission is sufficient to corroborate accomplice testimony in most circumstances
- stating that defendant's admission or confession is, under most circumstances, sufficient to corroborate accomplice testimony
- stating “[i]t is well established that [a defendant’s] admission or confession, under most circumstances, will be sufficient to corroborate the accomplice witness.”
- stating ―[i]t is well established that [a defendant‘s] admission or confession, under most circumstances, will be sufficient to corroborate the accomplice witness.‖
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Onion
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Carrillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-12-19· cited 254×
- McManus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-12-05· cited 193×
- Chambers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-05-24· cited 151×
- Ransom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-09-20· cited 146×
- Beets v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-09-21· cited 143×
- Livingston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-10-06· cited 133×
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-04-21· cited 132×
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-09-16· cited 122×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-10-30· cited 109×
- Willingham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-03-22· cited 93×
- Montoya v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2001-02-28· cited 60×
- Depauw v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1983-02-15· cited 59×
- Richardson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-10-09· cited 59×
- Bentley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-03-12· cited 56×
- Colunga v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-09-17· cited 55×
- Duncantell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-03-15· cited 55×
- Burnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-10-27· cited 53×
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-09-17· cited 45×
- Rodriquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-12-17· cited 42×
- Smith v. EstelleN.D. Texas· 1977-12-30· cited 39×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.