District Court of Appeal of Florida· 7/24/2001
Jackson v. State
Citations
- 789 So. 2d 1218
- 2001 WL 826706
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “As this court has explained, ‘the determination of whether defense counsel’s actions were tactical is a conclusion best made by the trial judge following an evi-dentiary hearing.’ ” (quoting Rosemond v. State, 634 So.2d 259, 260 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Morrison v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-10-24· cited 5×
- Greenway v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-07-26· cited 2×
- Foster v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-15· cited 2×
- Smedley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-10· cited 1×
- McCray v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-07-18· cited 1×
- State v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-12-05· cited 1×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Peede v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-08-19· cited 142×
- Gaskin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-07-01· cited 105×
- Comfort v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-04-29· cited 9×
- Rosemond v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-03-30· cited 4×
- Mitchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-07-24· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.