Idaho Supreme Court· 5/22/1964
Jackson v. State
Citations
- 392 P.2d 695
- 87 Idaho 267
- 1964 Ida. LEXIS 239
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \The authorities uniformly hold that the burden is on the petitioner in habeas corpus proceedings to establish the illegality of his detention.\
- “The authorities uniformly hold that the burden is on the petitioner in habeas corpus proceedings to establish the illegality of his detention.”
- “The authorities uniformly hold that the burden is on the petitioner in habeas corpus proceedings to establish the illegality of his detention.”
- \The authorities uniformly hold that the burden is on the petitioner in habeas corpus proceedings to establish the illegality of his detention.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McQuade, Knudson, McFadden, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WrightIdaho Supreme Court· 1975-11-05· cited 46×
- Ebersole v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1967-06-15· cited 42×
- Jacobsen v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1978-03-30· cited 25×
- Bourgeois v. MurphyIdaho Supreme Court· 1991-02-28· cited 14×
- Abercrombie v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 13×
- Coleman v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1988-08-11· cited 8×
- Bates v. MurphyIdaho Supreme Court· 1990-07-31· cited 7×
- Johnson v. Idaho Central Credit UnionIdaho Supreme Court· 1995-12-18· cited 6×
- State v. AlldredgeIdaho Supreme Court· 1974-06-27· cited 5×
- Nester v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1968-03-01· cited 3×
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court· 1962-04-30· cited 1,897×
- Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court· 1948-01-19· cited 1,645×
- In Re ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court· 1940-12-17· cited 160×
- McFadden v. McFaddenArizona Supreme Court· 1921-03-30· cited 49×
- Allen v. RhaySupreme Court· 1958-04-28· cited 46×
- Cobas v. ClappIdaho Supreme Court· 1957-12-12· cited 29×
- Cole v. RichmondSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1924-03-10· cited 28×
- Gould v. AustinWashington Supreme Court· 1909-04-07· cited 26×
- State v. ThurlowIdaho Supreme Court· 1962-11-07· cited 23×
- Wilson v. Los Angeles County Employees Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1954-08-31· cited 20×
- Govea v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1938-04-18· cited 17×
- Estate of HillCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1957-04-04· cited 15×
- In Re MartzIdaho Supreme Court· 1960-12-21· cited 15×
- People v. MendiettaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1951-01-19· cited 13×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1962-01-17· cited 13×
- Shellhaas v. Petrolane, Ltd.California Court of Appeal· 1950-06-23· cited 12×
- In Re ChesterCalifornia Supreme Court· 1959-05-01· cited 11×
- Hanley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1905-06-15· cited 11×
- Wyman v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1951-03-08· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.