Jackson v. Reiling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if causation and damages are difficult to determine,, injury is too speculative to support a claim
• explaining that damages which are too remote or speculative may not be recovered
• “There is no general test of remote and speculative damages, and such matters should usually be left to the judgment of the trial court.”
• “Damages which are remote and speculative may not be recovered.”
• plaintiff cannot recover damages that are “remote, conjectural, or speculative”
• plaintiff cannot recover for damages that are speculative

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).