Skip to main content
· 7/6/1905

Jackson v. Prior Hill Min. Co.

Citations

  • 19 S.D. 453
  • 104 N.W. 207
  • 1905 S.D. LEXIS 66

Syllabus

<p>1. Findings of a trial court on disputed questions of fact will be presumed correct on appeal unless there is a clear preponderance of the evidence against them.</p> <p>2. Where plaintiffs claimed certain mining claims under an alleged relocation of defendant’s claims, they thereby admitted the validity of defendant’s former location, and were estopped to deny the validity of the original location.</p> <p>3. Reversible error cannot be predicated on the rejection of offers to prove facts which were established by other uncontradicted evidence.</p>

Judges: Haney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.