Jackson v. Post Properties, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although plaintiff had equal knowledge of the risk of third-party criminal attack, defendant not entitled to summary judgment because a question of fact existed as to whether Plaintiff exercised ordinary care for her own safety
• whether the extra window locks offered by the apartment complex were sufficient to demonstrate ordinary care and whether the plaintiff’s rape “was the result of the flimsy nature of the [builder-installed] windows” were issues for the jury’s determination
• complex’s argument that plaintiff failed to exercise ordinary care by moving to a ground floor apartment “untenable” because it suggests that complex admits that its apartments were defectively designed and that any tenant who lives on ground floor assumes all risk of criminal attack

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).