Jackson v. Playboy Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no invasion of privacy where plaintiffs were photographed “on a city sidewalk in plain view of the public eye”
• photographs of three minor boys and policewoman on city sidewalk in plain view of the public eye were not “purely private activity”
• Knapke, 553 F. Supp. 3d 14 at 876, explicitly declined to apply this common law case to the ORPL
• publication of photograph of plaintiffs on a city sidewalk
• matters taking place in public are not private.
• plaintiff photographed on public street

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).