Jackson v. Pasadena Receivables, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Restatement (Second), § 187(1) and (2). In this case, the issue of what law governs Falls’s substantive rights, when § 187 of Restatement (Second
• concluding a conflict between the law of Maryland with the law of another jurisdiction does not, alone, “render the [law of the other jurisdiction] contrary to Maryland public policy” such that the law of the other jurisdiction is “unenforceable” under Restatement (Second
• concluding a conflict between the law of Maryland with the law of another jurisdiction does not, alone, “render the [law of the other jurisdiction] contrary to Maryland public policy” such that the law of the other jurisdiction is “unenforceable” under Restatement (Second) § 187(2)
• determining validity of an unsigned credit card agreement
• determining validity of an unsigned credit card agreement
• noting Maryland’s allegiance to lex loci contractus

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).