Jackson v. Parker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that argu‐ ments not raised before the district court are forfeited
• considering whether the record is adequately developed to review a for- feited argument
• considering whether the record is adequately developed to review a for- feited argument
• affirming grant of summary judgment for officer-defendant on plaintiff’s false arrest claim where officer had probable cause to arrest the plaintiff for driving a prohibited vehicle, even though officer never charged plaintiff for committing that crime
• rejecting party’s plain error argument where, among other things, he “ha[d] not made an attempt –- either in his briefs or at oral argument –- to show that the elements for plain error review ha[d] been satisfied”
• pointing to the lack of a developed record, the inability of the opposing party to add to that record, and the appealing party’s failure to show the elements of plain error review as indicating that the court should not address the argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).