Jackson v. Olexa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Alaska Sex Offender Registration Act was civil even though a knowing failure to comply would subject the offender to criminal prosecution
• recognizing that Alaska's legislature \could conclude that a conviction for a sex offense provides evidence of substantial risk of recidivism\
• holding that the Alaska Sex Offender Registration Act did not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause
• holding that Alaska’s Sex Offender Registration Act did not violate the ex post facto clause
• holding that Alaska’s sex offender registration statute is not an invalid ex post facto law because it is civil and non-punitive
• holding that Alaska’s Sex Offender Registration Act is nonpunitive; thus, its retroactive application does not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).