Eighth Circuit· 7/30/2009
Jackson v. Norris
Citations
- 573 F.3d 856
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 16825
- 2009 WL 2253540
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that testimony challenged on habeas review did not have a “substantial impact on the jury’s verdict” when it was “cumulative of other evidence”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wollman, Gibson, Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Mansfield v. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSEleventh Circuit· 2012-05-09· cited 82×
- Wood v. ErcoleSecond Circuit· 2011-05-04· cited 62×
- Nelson Gongora v. Rick Thaler, DirectorFifth Circuit· 2013-08-13· cited 2×
- Maurice Anderson v. John KingEighth Circuit· 2013-10-04· cited 1×
- Nelson Gongora v. Rick Thaler, DirectorFifth Circuit· 2013-08-21
- Jackson v. HobbsSupreme Court· 2010-05-03
- DeJong v. NebraskaD. Nebraska· 2017-02-09
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 7,022×
- Fry v. PlilerSupreme Court· 2007-06-11· cited 1,028×
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2004-11-04· cited 48×
- TOUG HONG CHANG v. MinnesotaEighth Circuit· 2008-04-01· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.