Jackson v. Muhlenberg Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing a grant of partial summary judgment on a meager factual record where the ruling sought would reach far beyond the particular case
• summary judgment dismissal of suit against hospital and blood bank by plaintiff, who contracted hepatitis allegedly due to blood transfusion, reversed because of inadequate record
• a “maximum of caution” is necessary when a ruling would “reach far beyond the particular case.”
• \The issue is a very important one involving highly significant policy considerations and obviously should not be decided on the wholly inadequate record before us.\
• hospital's assertion that it would use \utmost care\ in selecting blood donors to avoid contamination an affirmation of fact on seller's future performance or actions; hence, is an express warranty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).