Jackson v. Medical Coaches

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Rule 60(b) could not be used \to reconsider [a] previous judgment in light of later-discovered legal authority that could have and should have been presented to the court before the original judgments entered\
• determining trial justice's error in entering judgment with prejudice instead of without prejudice more than mere clerical error
• “the more general Rule 41 was not applicable when * * * a more specific provision [Rule 4© ] governed the precise factual situation in question”
• “Rule 60(b) does not constitute a vehicle for the motion justice to reconsider the previous judgments in light of later-discovered legal authority that could have and should have been presented to the court before the original judgments entered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).