Jackson v. McHargue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “computer-implemented” steps that “could ‘be performed in the human mind, or by a human using a pen and paper’ ” did not render asserted claims patent-eligible
• holding plaintiffs “attempts to dress up the claims as a computerized process” unavailing
• same, as to attempt to patent the “well known” process of dietary analysis and meal planning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).