Jackson v. Luellen Farms, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that our Court will affirm the judgment on any legal theory supported by the evidence
• emphasizing that “the mere fact that the Note refers to a mortgage does not strip it of its negotiability”
• emphasizing that “the mere fact that the Note refers to a mortgage does not strip it of its negotiability”
• explaining that “[p]ast consideration can generally not support a new obligation or promise”
• “the signatures of [the corporation] and Jackson are on separate lines and are both complete within themselves”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).