Jackson v. Louisiana Board of Review

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• resolving defendant’s claim under third prong of Golding without deciding whether claim was of constitutional magnitude
• jury was free to infer intent to kill from defendant’s failure to show concern for coworker’s welfare after shooting him
• ‘‘the jury was free to infer an intent to kill from the defendant’s failure to attempt to aid [the victim] or to show concern for [the victim’s] welfare’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).