Jackson v. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the two contestants being each next of kin to the intestate, “neither had any advantage of the other by reason of the nearness of his relationship by blood to the decedent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State Mutual Life & Annuity Ass'n v. Baldwin
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1903-01-09· cited 18×
• Rowe v. Walker
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1929-05-20· cited 4×
• Walker v. Rowe
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1930-09-06· cited 4×
• Sampson v. Sampson
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1932-02-17· cited 4×
• Darnell v. Tate
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1951-11-15· cited 3×
• Brannen v. Boyce
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-02-21· cited 1×