Jackson v. Hyde

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that while “[t]he trial court never did issue any express ruling on the 404 (b) motion,” it “implicitly granted the motion by allowing [the evidence] at trial”
• concluding that trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to request a limiting instruction contemporaneous with the admission of evidence under OCGA § 24- 33 4-404 (b), where the trial court gave such an instruction during the final charge
• noting that intrinsic evidence is not subject to the requirements of Rule 404 (b)
• finding no error in admission of prior inconsistent statement where witness, when asked to explain why the statement differed from her trial testimony, stated that she was “extremely tired and under the influence of drugs” when she gave the statement
• plain error review where appellant did not assert any objection when other acts evidence was first introduced at trial
• “The failure of a witness to remember making a statement may provide the foundation for offering extrinsic evidence to prove that the statement was made.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).