Skip to main content
· 8/14/1989

Jackson v. Harvard University

Citations

  • 721 F. Supp. 1397
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12326
  • 51 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 39,425
  • 50 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1026
  • 1989 WL 117715

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “the elasticity of promotion standards for teachers in an academic setting does not constitute, in and of itself, evidence of discrimination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Woodlock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.