Jackson v. Hammer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• attaching customer list as exhibit to unsealed affidavit is one of several acts that destroyed trade-secret status of customer list
• \[T]he determination of what steps are reasonably necessary to protect information is different for a large company than for a small one.\
• \[T]he Act requires a plaintiff to take `affirmative measures' to prevent others from using information.\
• “the standards to establish a customer list as a trade secret under the Act parallel the common law standards”
• \* * * the standards to establish a customer list as a trade secret under the [ITSA] parallel the common law standards\
• “[T]he determination of what steps are reasonably necessary to protect information is different for a large company than for a small one.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).