Jackson v. Faver

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even if transferee-wife knew that the transfer of assets was to defeat a pending claim against transferor-husband, transferee is protected at least up to the amount she paid (for the assets
• “[K]nowledge acquired by an attorney in the course of his employment, and pertinent and relevant to the subject matter of his employment, is imputable to his client.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).