Jackson v. Danberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing at summary judgment the plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment method of execution claim and rejecting the plaintiff’s argument that “future conduct by different [execution] personnel . . . will reflect past conduct by former personnel”
• discussing Baze as dispositive without mentioning plurality nature of lead opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jackson v. Danberg
  Third Circuit· 2010-02-01· cited 126×
• Jackson v. Danberg
  Third Circuit· 2011-09-07· cited 84×
• Cooey v. Strickland
  S.D. Ohio· 2009-04-21· cited 3×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
• Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
• Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation
  Supreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
• Baze v. Rees
  Supreme Court· 2008-04-16· cited 1,040×
• Nelson v. Campbell
  Supreme Court· 2004-05-24· cited 909×
• Hill v. McDonough
  Supreme Court· 2006-06-12· cited 658×
• Richard M. Wishkin v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General
  Third Circuit· 2007-02-07· cited 532×
• Philip J. Podobnik v. United States Postal Service National Rural Letter Carriers Association John E. Potter, Postmaster General of the United States
  Third Circuit· 2005-05-05· cited 531×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 1995-06-07· cited 388×