Jackson v. Corning Glass Works

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• held that obviousness of stacking Corning Ware and glass lids was so great that verdict was properly directed for the defendant
• no strict liability for injury caused by toppling of glassware stack when it was common knowledge that stack will fall with lateral force and glass will break
• held that obviousness of stacking Corning Ware and glass lids was so great that verdict was properly directed for the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).