Jackson v. Corcoran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “After giving all the terms of a contract their plain meaning . . . we determine whether language in a contract is ambiguous.”
• “After giving all the terms of a contract their plain meaning . . . we determine whether language in a contract is ambiguous”
• “To the extent that there appears to be conflict between these provisions, the specific governs the general.”
• ʺ[W]e may affirm on any ground that finds support in the record.ʺ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).