Jackson v. City & County of San Francisco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiff stated a valid claim of retaliation where “[the] defendants took specific, concrete actions against plaintiff in retaliation for his exercise of his First Amendment rights.”
• dismissing plaintiffs equal protection claim because his allegations were more properly addressed in the context of his retaliation claims
• dismissing First Amendment claim based on denial of three meals during Ramadan as “a de minimis burden on plaintiff's exercise of his religion”
• dismissing Free Exercise claims because the “allegations here show at most a de minimis burden on plaintiff’s exercise of his religion” (italics omitted)
• few isolated deprivations of religiously-mandated food do not give rise to First Amendment claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).