Jackson v. Bateman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding California's fee-shifting statute and explaining that the right to petition the government does not entitle a party to clog the courts and impair everyone else's right to justice
• “If the [fee-shifting provision] chills legitimate petitioning activity, it is merely incidental to and outweighed by the significant governmental interests the statute is designed to protect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).