Jackson v. ASA Holdings, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, absent allegations that defendants violated some provision of District of Columbia law, “conclusory allegation that Defendants wrongfully foreclosed is totally inadequate to state a claim for wrongful foreclosure”
• finding that the defendants’ foreclosure on plaintiff’s properties despite allegedly knowingly 18 lying to plaintiff about giving her assistance with loan modification did not constitute harm, 19 oppression, or abuse under FDCPA
• finding 3 allegations that “do[] little more than parrot the language of the statute in conclusory 4 fashion” fail to state an FDCPA claim
• “A conclusory allegation that Defendants wrongfully foreclosed is totally inadequate to state a claim for wrongful foreclosure.”
• “A conclusory allegation that Defendants wrongfully foreclosed is totally inadequate to state a claim for wrongful foreclosure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).