Jackson v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employer was exempt as to assistant store managers who spend 90% on non-exempt work because “such duties were performed simultaneously with their managerial functions”
• “As salaried employees, Plaintiffs received the same pay even if they worked less than 40 hours, and they were eligible for bonuses for which hourly employees were not.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).