Jackson Sawmill Company, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[A]ppellants possessed no constitutionally protected interest in a monopoly over traffic travelling between St. Louis and East St. Louis.\
• “[T]here is no property right or vested interest in a continuing flow of traffic.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).