Jackson ex dem. Hills v. Tuttle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Buckhannon in the context of a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act claim and collecting cases
• [Plaintiff] is not a “prevailing party” (and thus cannot be a substantially “prevailing party”) because she did not gain by judgment or consent decree a material alteration of the legal relationship of the parties.”
• \[plaintiff] is not a 'prevailing party' (and thus cannot be a substantially 'prevailing party')\ under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 because \she did not gain by judgment or consent decree a material alteration of the legal relationship of the parties\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).