Jackson County Hog Producers v. Consumers Power Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the installation of electricity was the tortious act, while the stray voltage was the resulting harm
• holding that the installation of electricity was the tortious act, while the stray voltage was the resulting harm
• holding that, under the discovery rule, “a claim does not accrue for limitations period purposes until the plaintiff discovers, or through the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered (1) an injury and (2
• holding MCPA did not apply “where plaintiffs purchased electricity from defendant primarily for the purpose of operating their business rather than ‘primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.’ ”
• “This Court may affirm a decision of a trial court for reasons different than those relied on by the trial court.”
• “This Court may affirm a decision of a trial court for reasons different than those relied on by the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).