Jackson (Charles W.) v. Merit Systems Protection Board v. Office of Personnel Management

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding in the context of a preliminary determination that the ITC did not abuse its discretion by using questionnaire responses that “represented a substantial majority of domestic production”
• sustaining Commission’s negative preliminary determination where impact findings were based on responses of 25 of 51 firms, which accounted for 74% of total shipments by quantity and 68% by value

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).