Jackson and Coker, Inc. v. Lynam

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the issue of emotional distress was one “easily understood by the jury,” and that the jury, in awarding no damages for emotional distress, may simply have disbelieved the plaintiffs uncorroborated evidence on the issue
• denying the Rule 50b motion because the “jury was entitled to reject [the defendant’s] interpretation of the contract”
• “Courts of this District have overwhelmingly concluded that there is a right to punitives under the PHRA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).