Jackman v. Continental Nat. Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an objection must enable the district judge to focus attention on the issues at the heart of the dispute
• holding that an objection must be sufficient to alert the Court to the factual and legal issues actually in dispute to avoid the objection’s waiver
• holding that an objection was insufficient where the party sought review based on “the motions, exhibits, testimony[,] briefs, and arguments” already presented to the court (alteration in original)
• holding that a “party’s objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation must be . . . specific to preserve an issue for de novo review by the district court”
• holding that “a party’s objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation must be both timely and specific to preserve an issue for de novo review by the district court or for appellate review”
• holding that a party’s objections to the legal and factual issues in the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation must be “specific to preserve an issue for de novo review by the district court or for appellate review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).