Jackie A. McGregor v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, A.K.A. Amtrak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a 100% healed policy is a per se violation 7 of the ADA because such a policy fails to allow a case-by-case determination for 8 accommodations
• holding that a policy requiring employ- ees to be “100% healed” or “fully healed” after an injury is facially discriminatory and constitutes a per se violation of the ADA
• cautioning that a 100-percent-healed policy allows an employer to circumvent the required individualized assessment
• remanding where the existence of a 100% healed policy or its equivalent 10 was a disputed material fact
• finding “100% healed” policy is a per se violation of the ADA because the policy does not allow 18 The District adopted Standard Operating Procedure Policy No. 18-034. Rozynski Decl. Ex. 8. (Dkt. 28-8.
• plaintiff must establish all prima facie elements of an ADA claim beyond dispute of material fact to prevail on summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).